« get it while you can | Main | above 7,500 signatures »

Aaron on the Aimster argument

June 4, 2003 12:02 PM - comments (3)

Nicely summarized here.

Posted on June 4, 2003 12:02 PM | | technorati

Comments (3)

June 5, 2003 10:00 PM Dan Steeves:

Aaron writes "The MPAA?s lawyer responded that the non-fringing use had to be of substantial commercial impact."

Is the MPAA's lawyer correct? Why does the standard for non-infringing use only refer to commercial impact. Say I want to trade pictures of my toes with foot-fetish buddies. This is non-commercial, since I place no value on pictures of my toes, but it is however of substantial impact to my community. Isn't it?

April 16, 2008 5:29 PM wow power leveling:

to david strogin: that's not something to brag about.

Post a comment

By entering the words in the box, you are also helping to digitize texts that were written before the computer age. The words that you see were taken directly from old texts that are being scanned and stored by the Internet Archive. This CAPTCHA helps proofread the books. If the sample is too hard to read, click the recycle button to get another two. A space between each word is required. And thanks for the comment and help.