Aaron on the Aimster argument
Nicely summarized here.
« get it while you can | Main | above 7,500 signatures »
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lessig Blog by Lawrence Lessig is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.
Comments (1)
Aaron writes "The MPAA?s lawyer responded that the non-fringing use had to be of substantial commercial impact."
Is the MPAA's lawyer correct? Why does the standard for non-infringing use only refer to commercial impact. Say I want to trade pictures of my toes with foot-fetish buddies. This is non-commercial, since I place no value on pictures of my toes, but it is however of substantial impact to my community. Isn't it?