« Free Culture goes legit | Main | support Hyperion »

A potentially important South African Constitutional Court decision

It's just been announced that the South African Constitutional Court has decided in favor of Laugh It Off. Laugh It Off had produced a series of t-shirts which used trademarks to make critical points about the trademark owner. The most famous of these shirts was one that used a famous beer label "Black Label" and remixed it to a "Black Label, White Guilt" logo. The producers of the t-shirt were sued, and lost in three courts. The Constitutional Court has now apparently reversed the judgment. I've not seen the opinion yet, and will update when it is posted. Here's an article with some background.

Update: Here's the decision.

| | technorati

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://lessig.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1638

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A potentially important South African Constitutional Court decision:

» Trademark Parody Okay Says South Africa's Constitutional Court from The Importance of...
Larry Lessig reports that the Constitutional Court of South Africa has decided a trademark parody case in favor of the parodists, Laugh it Off (A Potentially EXTREMELY Important South African Constitutional Court Decision). Background on the "Black Lab... [Read More]

» Trademark Parody Okay Says South Africa's Constitutional Court from The Importance of...
Larry Lessig reports that the Constitutional Court of South Africa has decided a trademark parody case in favor of the parodists, Laugh it Off (A Potentially EXTREMELY Important South African Constitutional Court Decision). Background on the "Black Lab... [Read More]

Comments (5)

Actually, the shirts say "Black Labour, White Guilt" in the same logo format. A contemporary classic!

That decision is somewhat worrying, for it mentions the possibility of the trademark holder prevailing if actual economic harm can be shown. Presumably one purpose of the shirts is to point out flaws in the moral position of the trademark brand and hence influence the public to be less likely to purchase the trademarked goods.

May 30, 2005 1:14 AM David Horwitz:

the image that was on the t-shirt can now be seen on their website: http://www.laughitoff.co.za/

Unlike James I think the judgment made a good effort to find a balance to between speech and property (trademark) - what was striking about the lower court descisions was their refusal to even consider this. The suporting judgment (by Justice albie Sachs) makes interesting reading on parody and its legal protection/evaluation.

Rolex Milgauss replica watches made with swiss movement ! so cheap and high quality ! accept paypal ,and 14 days money back without reason !

Professional and reliable website for selling dofus gold.

Post a comment

By entering the words in the box, you are also helping to digitize texts that were written before the computer age. The words that you see were taken directly from old texts that are being scanned and stored by the Internet Archive. This CAPTCHA helps proofread the books. If the sample is too hard to read, click the recycle button to get another two. A space between each word is required. And thanks for the comment and help.